Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Ulysses TURLEY Jr., Appellant. American Axle & Manufacturing Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 29, 2001, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
As a result of his conviction of driving while intoxicated, claimant was incarcerated in January 2000 and unable to report to his job as a machinist until he was released in August 2000. While claimant was in jail, his employer granted him two leaves of absence, but refused to grant him extended leave beyond April 10, 2000. Consequently, claimant was terminated from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits, ruling that he was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. After granting claimant's request for reconsideration, the Board adhered to its prior decision.
We affirm. This Court has held that a claimant's unavailability for employment due to incarceration for an alcohol-related offense constitutes misconduct disqualifying the claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Matyjczuk [Delphi Automotive Sys. Div. of Gen. Motors Corp.-Commissioner of Labor], 262 A.D.2d 847, 848, 692 N.Y.S.2d 219; Matter of Opoka [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 718, 719, 647 N.Y.S.2d 874). Inasmuch as it is undisputed that claimant was unable to report to work because of his incarceration, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 18, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)