Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Ira W. LEVINE, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 12, 1999, which dismissed claimant's appeal for his failure to appear at the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed February 16, 2001, which denied claimant's application to reopen the previous default decision denying his application for unemployment insurance benefits.
By initial determination, claimant was ruled ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he failed to comply with registration requirements. Claimant requested a hearing. When claimant failed to appear at the administrative hearing on three occasions because he either was unavailable or not ready to proceed, a default decision was entered sustaining the initial determination. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed claimant's appeal on the ground that he was statutorily precluded from appealing the default decision due to his failure to appear at the administrative hearing. This appeal ensued. Given the evidence in the record and the inferences to be drawn therefrom, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision dismissing the appeal (see, Labor Law § 621[1]; Matter of Hungerford [Commissioner of Labor], 273 A.D.2d 680, 711 N.Y.S.2d 358). Furthermore, we find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant's application to reopen the ALJ's default decision given his failure once again to attend an administrative hearing (see, Matter of Gbolo [Commissioner of Labor], 272 A.D.2d 775, 708 N.Y.S.2d 649).
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 04, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)