Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MT. ARAB MASONIC HISTORICAL SOCIETY, Appellant, v. TOWN OF ALTAMONT BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lahtinen, J.), entered April 12, 1998 in Franklin County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed the petition as time barred.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that respondent arbitrarily denied its application pursuant to Real Property Tax Law § 420-b for a partial exemption from local real property taxes and assessment. Respondent answered and sought dismissal of the petition contending, inter alia, that such proceeding was barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations. Supreme Court concluded that the proceeding was one properly brought pursuant to RPTL article 7 and dismissed the petition as time barred prompting this appeal by petitioner.
We affirm. Inasmuch as petitioner challenges its individual tax assessment based upon respondent's refusal to grant a partial exemption and does not attack the assessment on jurisdictional or constitutional grounds, a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7 is petitioner's exclusive remedy (see, Matter of Cornwell v. Town of Esperance, 252 A.D.2d 795, 676 N.Y.S.2d 258; Matter of Krugman v. Board of Assessors of Vil. of Atl. Beach, 141 A.D.2d 175, 179-180, 533 N.Y.S.2d 495, appeal dismissed 73 N.Y.2d 872, 537 N.Y.S.2d 498, 534 N.E.2d 336). Petitioner failed to commence this proceeding within the 30-day limitations period governing RPTL article 7 proceedings (see, RPTL 702) and, accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition as time barred (see, Matter of Lamos v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of Argyle, 194 A.D.2d 1025, 1027, 599 N.Y.S.2d 886).
In light of this conclusion, we need not address the remaining arguments advanced by petitioner.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
CREW III, J.
MIKOLL, J.P., YESAWICH JR., SPAIN and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 04, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)