Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Philip M. MERCURIO, Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated November 30, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that compliance with a notice of claim provision in an insurance policy is a condition precedent to an insurer's liability under the policy (see Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 436, 340 N.Y.S.2d 902, 293 N.E.2d 76; see also Roche v. G.E. Capital Life Assur. Co. of N.Y., 281 A.D.2d 932, 722 N.Y.S.2d 456; Sayed v. Macari, 296 A.D.2d 396, 744 N.Y.S.2d 509). Moreover, “absent a valid excuse, a failure to satisfy the notice requirement vitiates the policy” (Security Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v Acker-Fitzsimons Corp., supra at 440, 340 N.Y.S.2d 902, 293 N.E.2d 76).
Here, the disability policy which the plaintiff purchased from the defendant required “[w]ritten notice of claim * * * within 60 days after the occurrence or commencement of any loss covered [under the] policy.” In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant demonstrated that the plaintiff did not provide notice of claim until more than five years after the occurrence of his disability. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any valid excuse for the delay or to otherwise raise a material issue of fact that would require a trial of the action.
Accordingly, under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Gresham v. American Gen. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 135 A.D.2d 1121, 523 N.Y.S.2d 282; see generally Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 28, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)