Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William MINGUES, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.), rendered October 4, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree.
On May 31, 1996, defendant pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with two counts of grand larceny in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. Thereafter, and prior to sentencing, defendant moved, pro se, to withdraw his plea on the grounds that it was the product of duress and coercion and, further, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Following appointment of new counsel an evidentiary hearing was held, after which County Court denied the motion and sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement as a second felony offender to two concurrent prison terms of 3 1/212 to 7 years.
At the outset, we note that while defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude judicial review of the voluntariness of his plea (see, People v. Marziale, 182 A.D.2d 1035, 1036, 583 N.Y.S.2d 36, lv. denied 80 N.Y.2d 835, 587 N.Y.S.2d 919, 600 N.E.2d 646), it does preclude review of his alleged denial of his right to the effective assistance of counsel except insofar as the alleged ineffectiveness impacted the voluntary nature of his plea (see, People v. Conyers, 227 A.D.2d 793, 642 N.Y.S.2d 450, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 982, 649 N.Y.S.2d 389, 672 N.E.2d 615). Our review of the record reveals nothing to support defendant's claim that his plea was rendered involuntary by defense counsel's conduct, nor are we persuaded that defendant's newly assigned counsel for the hearing failed to provide him with meaningful representation. Accordingly, defendant's conviction must be affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CREW, J.
MIKOLL, J.P., and YESAWICH, SPAIN and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 03, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)