Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph A. FUSCO, Respondent-Appellant, v. Jean A. MIELE, et al., Appellants-Respondents, Westchester County Board of Elections, Respondent-Respondent, et al., Respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Jean A. Miele and John T. Yu as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 12, 2000, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidates for the party positions of Female and Male Members, respectively, of the Independence Party New York State Committee for the 86th Assembly District, the appeal is from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered August 10, 2000, as, after a hearing, granted the petition and invalidated the designating petition, and the petitioner cross-appeals from the same final order on the ground that it failed to rule on his alternative challenge to the petition.
ORDERED that the cross appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the petitioner is not aggrieved by the final order entered in his favor (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the contention of the appellants-respondents, the Supreme Court properly held that certain signatures on the designating petition, consisting only of the first name of the signers, were invalid, even though they were accompanied by the full name of the signers printed next to the signatures. Under these circumstances, the identity of the signer as a registered voter cannot be established by reference to the signature on the petition and that of a person whose name appears in the registration poll ledgers (see, Election Law § 6-134[5]; Lane v. Meisser, 24 A.D.2d 720, 263 N.Y.S.2d 151). Accordingly, since the total number of valid signatures is less than the number required for designation, the application by the petitioner was properly granted.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 23, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)