Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Lemar C. THORPE, Appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered December 19, 1995, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, assault in the third degree (two counts), menacing in the second degree, and criminal contempt in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of assault in the third degree under the ninth count of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
On March 10, 1995, the defendant, who had waited for the complainant in the hallway by her apartment, threw the complainant against the wall and punched her in the head. After the incident, the complainant went to the hospital complaining of a severe headache. Fourteen days later, the defendant went to the complainant's apartment, kicked down the door and repeatedly beat and threatened the complainant until she finally escaped through the window. This subsequent assault required the complainant to be hospitalized for five days.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of burglary in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Cowan, 184 A.D.2d 778, 585 N.Y.S.2d 486). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15[5] ).
However, we agree with the defendant's contention that the People failed to present any evidence as to physical impairment or pain or the extent of pain suffered to establish “physical injury” (Penal Law §§ 10.00 [9]; 120.00) for the incident occurring on March 10, 1995 (see, Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198, 200, 424 N.Y.S.2d 418, 400 N.E.2d 358; People v. Briggs, 220 A.D.2d 762, 632 N.Y.S.2d 851; People v. Carney, 179 A.D.2d 818, 579 N.Y.S.2d 157; People v. Smith, 176 A.D.2d 904, 905, 575 N.Y.S.2d 671). Accordingly, the conviction of assault in the third degree under the ninth count of the indictment is reversed.
The sentence is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)