Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Varsey JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Joseph SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination which found him guilty of refusing a direct order and creating a disturbance. According to the misbehavior report, although petitioner was among a group of inmates in the commissary area that was twice given a direct order to lower their voices, petitioner nevertheless continued to speak in a loud manner. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the correction officer that authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sanders v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 987, 988, 849 N.Y.S.2d 329 [2008]; Matter of Martin v. Goord, 46 A.D.3d 1294, 1295, 847 N.Y.S.2d 868 [2007] ). Petitioner's claim that he was not among the group involved in the incident created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Martin v. Goord, 46 A.D.3d at 1295, 847 N.Y.S.2d 868; Matter of Smith v. Goord, 45 A.D.3d 1119, 1120, 844 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2007] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to inform him of the charges and to enable him to prepare a defense (see Matter of Reddick v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 764, 764, 838 N.Y.S.2d 793 [2007]; Matter of Morillo v. Goord, 38 A.D.3d 947, 948, 832 N.Y.S.2d 301 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining claim of hearing officer bias is not preserved and, in any event, is not persuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)