Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GERALD W. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated March 16, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 3, 2004, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of assault in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation for 12 months and directed that he perform 150 hours of community service. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated February 3, 2004.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in placing him on probation and directing him to perform community service, particularly in view of the nature of the incident, the appellant's poor record of performance in school, and the recommendation made in the probation report (see Matter of Diana V., 297 A.D.2d 535, 746 N.Y.S.2d 902; Matter of Christian G., 287 A.D.2d 299, 300, 731 N.Y.S.2d 362; Matter of Steven R., 230 A.D.2d 745, 646 N.Y.S.2d 60; Matter of Christopher B., 229 A.D.2d 390, 644 N.Y.S.2d 653). Moreover, the appellant was not entitled to an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal merely because this was his first “brush with the law” (Matter of Nikita P., 3 A.D.3d 499, 501, 769 N.Y.S.2d 602; see Matter of Steven R., supra ).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 15, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)