Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Damone COLE, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Program, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of refusing a direct order, interference with a facility employee, possession of contraband and smuggling. The misbehavior report alleged that petitioner, while on drug watch, indicated to a correction officer that he had to use the bathroom. Petitioner was instructed to keep his hands in plain view. Thereafter, petitioner allegedly made a quick movement toward his anal area and was ordered by the correction officer to stop. Petitioner, however, lunged toward the toilet with either a balloon or condom, ripped through the plastic covering the toilet and flushed the contraband down the toilet.
Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed misbehavior report, combined with petitioner's own testimony, provide substantial evidence to support the finding of his guilt (see, Matter of Greene v. Couture, 264 A.D.2d 915, 696 N.Y.S.2d 99). Petitioner's claim that he lost his balance while using the bathroom and never ripped the plastic in order to flush something down the toilet merely created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Rosario v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 714, 696 N.Y.S.2d 573).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)