Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Emil Michael PIGNETTI III, appellant, v. Susan E. MAUST, respondent (Proceeding No. 1).
IN RE: Susan E. Maust, respondent, v. Emil Michael Pignetti III, appellant (Proceeding No. 2).
In consolidated child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Kiedaisch, J.), entered April 5, 1999, which, after a hearing, denied his petition for custody of the parties' child and granted the mother's petition to relocate with the child from Orange County, New York, to Fort Drum, New York.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the father's petition is granted, and the mother's petition is denied as academic.
“ ‘[A] change in custody should be made only if the totality of the circumstances warrants a change that is in the best interests of the child’ (Matter of Paul Seth G. v. Antoinette M., 227 A.D.2d 620, 622 [643 N.Y.S.2d 592]; see also, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167 [451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260] ). Moreover, ‘[t]he determination of a child's custody by a hearing court is entitled to great weight on appeal, and should not be set aside lightly, as it is to a large extent a matter of the court's discretion, depending heavily upon the Judge's assessment of the credibility of witnesses and the character and temperament of the parties' (Matter of Vernon Mc. v. Brenda N., 196 A.D.2d 823 [602 N.Y.S.2d 58] ). However, that discretion is not absolute and may be set aside where it lacks a sound basis in the record, or is contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, Matter of Darlene T., 28 N.Y.2d 391 [322 N.Y.S.2d 231, 271 N.E.2d 215]; Young v. Young, 212 A.D.2d 114, 117 [628 N.Y.S.2d 957] )” (Matter of Lopez v. Lopez, 233 A.D.2d 398, 399 [650 N.Y.S.2d 240] ).
We find that custody with the father would be in the child's best interests (see, Matter of Morgan v. Becker, 245 A.D.2d 889, 666 N.Y.S.2d 820; Matter of Brown v. Brown, 236 A.D.2d 611, 654 N.Y.S.2d 679). The Family Court's determination to the contrary was against the weight of the evidence.
In light of the foregoing, the mother's petition to relocate with the child to Fort Drum, New York, is academic.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 06, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)