Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: R. Thomas BALDASSARE, deceased. Stefano A. Masi, appellant; v. Joan Baldassare, et al., respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In a probate proceeding in which Stefano A. Masi petitioned pursuant to SCPA 2205 to compel a trust accounting, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Brandon R. Sall, S.), dated March 21, 2022. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition and dismissed the petition.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The decedent, R. Thomas Baldassare, died testate in March 1990. The decedent's will named his wife, Joan Baldassare, as the executor of his estate. In August 1990, Joan created a disclaimer trust (hereinafter the disclaimer trust) by filing a notice of renunciation of interest with the Surrogate's Court. On October 1, 1990, Stefano A. Masi was appointed trustee of the disclaimer trust.
By petition dated April 30, 2021, Masi sought to compel an accounting by Joan pursuant to SCPA 2205. In October 2021, Joan and the decedent's children Karen Klypka, Alice McGillycuddy, and Toni–Ann Baldassare Giordano (hereinafter collectively the respondents) moved to dismiss the petition. Masi opposed their motion. By order dated March 21, 2022, the Surrogate's Court, inter alia, granted the respondents’ motion and dismissed the petition. Masi appeals.
SCPA 2205 provides, inter alia, that the Surrogate's Court may at any time, upon it appearing that it is for the best interests of the estate, make an order requiring a fiduciary to file an intermediate or final account within such time and in such manner as directed (see id. § 2205[1][a]). Here, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in determining, in effect, that compelling Joan to file an account was not in the best interests of the estate (see Matter of Lorenzetti [Kennedy], 122 A.D.3d 548, 549, 998 N.Y.S.2d 18; Matter of Mastroianni, 105 A.D.3d 1136, 1138, 962 N.Y.S.2d 780; Matter of Taber, 96 A.D.2d 890, 890, 466 N.Y.S.2d 50).
In light of our determination, we need not reach Masi's remaining contention.
BARROS, J.P., IANNACCI, WOOTEN and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023-05880
Decided: December 18, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)