Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of John O. LAMBERT, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 23, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant worked as a custodian for a school district for 10 years. He was terminated from his position after he refused to sign a weekly inspection report and threw the report at his supervisor. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant appeals.
We affirm. “It is well settled that failure to comply with a reasonable request of an employer can constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Mercure [Commissioner of Labor], 27 A.D.3d 857, 857, 810 N.Y.S.2d 570 [2006] [citations omitted] ). Here, claimant refused to sign the report because he was concerned that his supervisor might write in comments, although he admitted that his signature was to acknowledge receipt of the report, not his agreement with its contents. In our view, this was not sufficient reason for claimant's failure to accede to the employer's reasonable request (see Matter of Guagliardo [Commissioner of Labor], 27 A.D.3d 866, 867, 810 N.Y.S.2d 557 [2006] ). Moreover, while claimant denied throwing the report at his supervisor, his assertion presented a credibility issue to be resolved by the Board in light of the contrary testimony (see Matter of Kretchmer [Commissioner of Labor], 8 A.D.3d 849, 850, 779 N.Y.S.2d 261 [2004] ). Inasmuch as there is substantial evidence indicating that claimant was discharged for insubordination, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision. We have considered claimant's remaining contentions and find them to be unavailing.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 09, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)