Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Najwa SOBTI, etc., et al., appellants, v. LINDENHURST SCHOOL DISTRICT, respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated January 3, 2006, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Nine-year-old Najwa Sobti (hereinafter the infant plaintiff) was injured when she fell from a school playground horizontal ladder during recess. As the infant plaintiff reached for the third rung of the horizontal ladder, her hand slipped from the rung and she fell to the ground. The plaintiffs alleged that the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff were the result of inadequate ground cover on the playground surface beneath the horizontal ladder.
The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that it maintained the playground in a reasonably safe condition (see Swan v. Town of Brookhaven, 32 A.D.3d 1012, 821 N.Y.S.2d 265; Capotosto v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 2 A.D.3d 384, 386, 767 N.Y.S.2d 857; Banks v. Freeport Union Free School Dist., 302 A.D.2d 341, 753 N.Y.S.2d 890; Lopez v. Freeport Union Free School Dist., 288 A.D.2d 355, 734 N.Y.S.2d 97; Cronin v. Middle Country Cent. School Dist., 267 A.D.2d 269, 700 N.Y.S.2d 60). The nonmandatory United States Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines referred to by the plaintiffs and their other proof in opposition to the motion were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether inadequate ground cover on the day of the accident proximately caused the infant plaintiff's injuries (see Swan v. Town of Brookhaven, supra; Capotosto v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr., supra; Washington v. City of Yonkers, 293 A.D.2d 741, 742 N.Y.S.2d 316; Merson v. Syosset Cent. School Dist., 286 A.D.2d 668, 730 N.Y.S.2d 132; cf. Gonzalez v. Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 298 A.D.2d 358, 751 N.Y.S.2d 256; Marrione v. Ficano Enters., 277 A.D.2d 291, 715 N.Y.S.2d 747).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 05, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)