Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Neo NKHEREANYE, appellant, v. Inatus HILLAIRE, et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated August 17, 2005, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law through competent evidence that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject automobile accident (see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345, 746 N.Y.S.2d 865, 774 N.E.2d 1197; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 582 N.Y.S.2d 990, 591 N.E.2d 1176; D'Alba v. Yong-Ae Choi, 33 A.D.3d 650, 823 N.Y.S.2d 423; Faulkner v. Steinman, 28 A.D.3d 604, 813 N.Y.S.2d 529; Giraldo v. Mandanici, 24 A.D.3d 419, 805 N.Y.S.2d 124; Meyers v. Bobower Yeshiva Bnei Zion, 20 A.D.3d 456, 797 N.Y.S.2d 773). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Most of the plaintiff's medical submissions were without probative value because they were unsworn or unaffirmed (see Grasso v. Angerami, 79 N.Y.2d 813, 580 N.Y.S.2d 178, 588 N.E.2d 76; Bycinthe v. Kombos, 29 A.D.3d 845, 815 N.Y.S.2d 693; Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 587 N.Y.S.2d 692). The affirmed medical report of the plaintiff's orthopedist also lacked probative value because it relied on the unsworn reports of others (see Baksh v. Shabi, 32 A.D.3d 525, 820 N.Y.S.2d 327; Felix v. New York City Tr. Auth., 32 A.D.3d 527, 819 N.Y.S.2d 835; Jian-Yu Zhang v. Qiang Wang, 24 A.D.3d 611, 808 N.Y.S.2d 340; Friedman v. U-Haul Truck Rental, 216 A.D.2d 266, 627 N.Y.S.2d 765). The remainder of the plaintiff's submissions was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Brobeck v. Jolloh, 32 A.D.3d 526, 819 N.Y.S.2d 840).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 05, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)