Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Becky L. ARNOLD, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Becky L. Arnold, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. She maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Binghamton, Broome County.
We grant petitioner's motion to confirm a Referee's report that sustained five charges of professional misconduct against respondent. As set forth in the petition, respondent violated the Appellate Division attorney disciplinary rules by failing to appear at scheduled court proceedings and neglecting client cases, by failing to communicate with her clients, opposing counsel and Supreme Court, Broome County, by attempting to mislead and deceive said court and petitioner, by failing to comply with a court order, and by failing to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation (see Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 1-102[A][4], [5], [7]; DR 6-101[A][3]; DR 7-101[A] [22 NYCRR 1200.3(a)(4), (5), (7); 1200.30(a)(3); 1200.32(a) ] ). In aggravation of respondent's misconduct, petitioner cites two prior letters of admonition it issued to her in 2002 and 2005.
We have considered respondent's affidavit in opposition to petitioner's motion as well as her testimony in mitigation and the favorable character affidavits she has submitted. Under all of the circumstances presented, we conclude that, in order to protect the public, deter similar misconduct, and preserve the reputation of the bar, respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months.
ORDERED that petitioner's motion to confirm the Referee's report is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is found guilty of the professional misconduct charged and specified in the petition of charges, except for specification 4 of charge II; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, and until further order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).
PER CURIAM.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, CARPINELLO, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)