Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rufus SPEARS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered October 8, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court correctly refused to charge manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense of murder in the second degree, as there was no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury rather than death (see, CPL 300.50[1]; People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61, 453 N.Y.S.2d 660, 439 N.E.2d 376; People v. Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427, 452 N.Y.S.2d 389, 437 N.E.2d 1146). The defendant and his accomplice fired nine shots at the victim. The victim suffered six wounds, including one to the head resulting from a shot fired at a distance of two inches or less, one to the chest, one to the neck, and three to the back. This evidence concerning the number and location of the wounds, and the other circumstances of the shooting, support the trial court's conclusion that the submission of the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the first degree to the jury was not warranted (see, e.g., People v. Kelly, 221 A.D.2d 661, 633 N.Y.S.2d 845; People v. Dennis, 208 A.D.2d 945, 617 N.Y.S.2d 908; People v. Porteous, 193 A.D.2d 631, 597 N.Y.S.2d 446; People v. Rielly, 190 A.D.2d 695, 593 N.Y.S.2d 275; People v. Boo Wat Cheung, 141 A.D.2d 556, 529 N.Y.S.2d 165).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 03, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)