Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roderick WILLIAMS, respondent, v. Heather L. FOSTER, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Sam D. Walker, J.), dated June 30, 2022. The order denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.
The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries that he allegedly sustained on August 27, 2019, when the motorcycle that he was riding collided with the defendant's vehicle at an intersection in Mount Vernon. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the plaintiff caused the accident by striking the defendant's vehicle as the defendant was making a left turn. In an order dated June 30, 2022, the Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion. The defendant appeals.
“A defendant moving for summary judgment in a negligence action has the burden of establishing, prima facie, that he or she was not at fault in the happening of the subject accident” (Boulos v. Lerner–Harrington, 124 AD3d 709, 709; see Pouncey v. New York City Tr. Auth., 219 AD3d 512). Here, the defendant established her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting, inter alia, the transcripts of the deposition testimony of the parties. According to the defendant's deposition testimony, when the vehicle she was driving was about half a block away from the intersection, traveling in the left lane, she activated her left turn signal. She slowly began to make her left turn from the left lane, and she was more than three-quarters of the way into making the left turn when the plaintiff's motorcycle struck the left rear quarter panel of her vehicle. The plaintiff testified at his deposition that he remembered seeing a white car ahead of him as he approached the intersection, but he did not remember how the accident occurred. The deposition testimony demonstrated, prima facie, that the plaintiff was negligent in striking the defendant's vehicle, which was properly making a left turn, and that the plaintiff's negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident.
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff's affidavit submitted in opposition to the motion contradicted his earlier deposition testimony and raised only a feigned issue of fact (see Kirby v. Lett, 208 AD3d 1174, 1176; Singh v. 180 Varick, LLC, 203 AD3d 1194, 1196). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WARHIT and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022–06407
Decided: December 27, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)