Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TROY D. BYNUM SR., Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: November 9, 2023
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Kevin P. Dooley, J.), rendered June 15, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the first degree.
Defendant was indicted and charged with attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), attempted assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and aggravated criminal contempt. The charges stemmed from an incident wherein defendant kicked down the door of his estranged wife's residence and attacked her with a hammer and screwdriver. In full satisfaction of the indictment, defendant agreed to plead guilty to one count of burglary in the first degree with the understanding that his term of imprisonment would be capped at seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. As part of the plea agreement, defendant was not required to waive his right to appeal. Defendant pleaded guilty in conformity with the agreement, and County Court, citing both the violent nature of the attack and defendant's extensive criminal history, sentenced defendant to a prison term of seven years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. This appeal ensued.
Defendant's sole contention upon appeal is that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh or severe. We disagree. As County Court aptly observed, defendant has a long history of violent and assaultive conduct, and his self-reported mental health issues neither excuse nor mitigate the nature of the attack upon his estranged spouse (see e.g. People v. Marlett, 191 AD3d 1183, 1188 [3d Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 966 [2021] ). Upon considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances, we do not find the sentence imposed to be unduly harsh or severe (see CPL 470.15[6][b] ), and we decline defendant's invitation to reduce it in the interest of justice.
Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Clark, Ceresia and McShan, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 110576
Decided: November 30, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)