Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James N. MYERS Jr., Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cholakis, J.), rendered November 20, 2006 in Rensselaer County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of harassment in the second degree.
Stemming from an incident wherein defendant threatened his former spouse at her workplace, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of harassment in the second degree. Defendant subsequently was sentenced to time served and an order of protection for one year was issued. Defendant now appeals, contending both that his plea was involuntary and that Supreme Court erred in not issuing the limited order of protection promised in the plea agreement. We affirm.
As defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea or vacate his judgment of conviction, his challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is not preserved for our review (see People v. Bagley, 34 A.D.3d 992, 824 N.Y.S.2d 457 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 878, 832 N.Y.S.2d 490, 864 N.E.2d 620 [2007]; People v. Evans, 27 A.D.3d 905, 906, 810 N.Y.S.2d 590 [2006], lv. denied 6 N.Y.3d 847, 816 N.Y.S.2d 753, 849 N.E.2d 976 [2006] ). Likewise, defendant's challenge that Supreme Court's issuance of a full stay-away order of protection was not part of his plea agreement was not preserved for review (see People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 315-317, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 [2004]; People v. Reid, 21 A.D.3d 1215, 1216, 801 N.Y.S.2d 437 [2005] ) and, based upon the particular facts of this case, we decline to grant defendant any relief in the interest of justice (see People v. Robinson, 42 A.D.3d 581, 582, 837 N.Y.S.2d 879 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CREW III, J.
CARDONA, P.J., PETERS, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 13, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)