Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Angelique REID, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 20, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was terminated from her position managing revenue recovery projects for Health Insurance Plan of New York after the employer learned that she misrepresented her income to a bank in connection with a home mortgage application. Claimant's application for unemployment insurance benefits was thereafter denied on the ground that her misrepresentation constituted disqualifying misconduct. Following hearings, the Administrative Law Judge sustained the initial determination, and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed. Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. Conduct may be disqualifying when it violates generally accepted standards of behavior that an employer has the right to expect from its employees or bears materially upon an employee's honesty or integrity to serve in a particular capacity (see Matter of Sinker [Sweeney], 89 N.Y.2d 485, 487-488, 655 N.Y.S.2d 842, 678 N.E.2d 454 [1997]; Matter of Punter [Ross], 43 N.Y.2d 743, 744, 401 N.Y.S.2d 789, 372 N.E.2d 576 [1977] ). Here, although claimant denied manufacturing salary verification letters on the employer's letterhead, she admitted to misrepresenting her employment income to the bank when she initially pursued the mortgage application. Inasmuch as this apparent dishonesty impacted upon claimant's fitness to continue in her employment, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's determination (see Matter of Washington [Commissioner of Labor], 304 A.D.2d 896, 896, 757 N.Y.S.2d 366 [2003]; Matter of McAllister [Commissioner of Labor], 301 A.D.2d 1012, 1012, 754 N.Y.S.2d 455 [2003] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 23, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)