Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Owen FARLEY, appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, ARTICLE 1-B PENSION FUND, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department, Article 1-B Pension Fund, dated September 27, 2002, which denied the petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated March 27, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Where, as here, the respondent Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department, Article 1-B Pension Fund, denies an application for an accident disability pension by a tie vote, pursuant to Matter of City of New York v. Schoeck, 294 N.Y. 559, 63 N.E.2d 104, this court may set aside that determination only if it can conclude as a matter of law that the petitioner's disability was a natural and proximate result of a service-related accident (see Matter of Canfora v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 60 N.Y.2d 347, 469 N.Y.S.2d 635, 457 N.E.2d 740; Matter of Guidal v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 275 A.D.2d 458, 713 N.Y.S.2d 130). If there is any credible evidence that the disability was not caused by service-related injuries, the determination must stand (see Matter of Meyer v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 90 N.Y.2d 139, 659 N.Y.S.2d 215, 681 N.E.2d 382). Only where the circumstances allow but one inference may the court decide, as a matter of law, what inference should be drawn (see Matter of Guidal v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, supra ).
In view of the medical evidence presented, we cannot conclude, as a matter of law, that the petitioner's disability was a natural and proximate cause of a service-related accident (see Matter of Wesarg v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 246 A.D.2d 601, 668 N.Y.S.2d 41; Matter of Fagan v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. I-B Pension Fund, 185 A.D.2d 341, 586 N.Y.S.2d 631). Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb the determination.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 20, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)