Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gerald CHARLES, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit altering an authorized item and possession of a weapon. According to the misbehavior report, a metal nail file imbedded in a pen and sticking out about three quarters of an inch was found in petitioner's locker. The fact that the contraband was found in an area within petitioner's control gives rise to an inference that the weapon belonged to him (see Matter of Johnson v. Goord, 7 A.D.3d 901, 776 N.Y.S.2d 639 [2004]; Matter of Alston v. Goord, 4 A.D.3d 708, 709, 771 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2004] ). This inference, together with the misbehavior report, picture of the altered pen and testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Cummings v. Goord, 10 A.D.3d 748, 781 N.Y.S.2d 708 [2004]; Matter of Davis v. Senkowski, 306 A.D.2d 778, 761 N.Y.S.2d 538 [2003] ). Petitioner's contention that the pen did not belong to him presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Cummings v. Goord, supra ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 16, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)