Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Felipe OLIVERO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al., Respondents.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During an investigation, it was discovered that petitioner attempted to compel a fellow incarcerated individual to receive drugs through the mail and threatened him with physical harm if he refused. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats and extortion. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed on administrative review and petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
The misbehavior report, hearing testimony and confidential testimony provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Killimayer v. Annucci, 199 A.D.3d 1151, 1151, 156 N.Y.S.3d 586 [3d Dept. 2021]; Matter of Ortiz v. Annucci, 163 A.D.3d 1383, 1384, 80 N.Y.S.3d 746 [3d Dept. 2018]). Moreover, the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the confidential source, an interview that was sufficiently detailed in order for the Hearing Officer to make an independent assessment of the reliability and credibility of the testimony and information provided (see Matter of Cajigas v. Rodriguez, 214 A.D.3d 1293, 1293–1294, 184 N.Y.S.3d 631 [3d Dept. 2023]; Matter of Chandler v. Annucci, 135 A.D.3d 1258, 1259, 23 N.Y.S.3d 494 [3d Dept. 2016]). The exculpatory testimony of petitioner and his witnesses created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Hoyes v. Annucci, 213 A.D.3d 1011, 1012, 180 N.Y.S.3d 925 [3d Dept. 2023]; Matter of Santos v. Annucci, 209 A.D.3d 1084, 1085, 175 N.Y.S.3d 616 [3d Dept. 2022]). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent not specifically addressed, have been considered and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Garry, P.J., Lynch, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 535821
Decided: August 10, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)