Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Anthony RAMOS, etc., appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Thomas P. Aliotta, J.), dated December 21, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the defendants' motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging negligence and wrongful death.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In August 2017, the plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Justin Ramos, commenced this action against the City of New York, New York City Police Department, and FDNY Emergency Medical Services to recover damages for personal injuries and wrongful death allegedly sustained by Justin Ramos (hereinafter the decedent) as the result of, inter alia, the alleged failure by the defendants to timely respond to an emergency involving the decedent and to provide proper medical treatment to him. The defendants moved, among other things, for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging negligence and wrongful death. In an order dated December 21, 2020, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted those branches of the motion. The plaintiff appeals.
“When a negligence claim is asserted against a municipality, the first issue for a court to decide is whether the municipal entity was engaged in a proprietary function or acted in a governmental capacity at the time the claim arose” (Applewhite v. Accuhealth, Inc., 21 NY3d 420, 425). Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they were engaged in a governmental function and that they did not owe the decedent a special duty (see id. at 423; Laratro v. City of New York, 8 NY3d 79, 83). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendants' motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging negligence and wrongful death.
DUFFY, J.P., WOOTEN, FORD and WAN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2020-09729
Decided: August 09, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)