Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COALITION OF LANDLORDS, HOMEOWNERS & MERCHANTS, INC., appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the respondents' determinations dated November 19, 2003, and January 13, 2004, denying, without a hearing, the petitioner's request for information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law article 6), and denying an administrative appeal, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), entered December 20, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law article 6, hereinafter FOIL), the petitioner sought, inter alia, “the names and addresses of all applicants in regards to their rental permit policy ․ in the Town of Brookhaven.” The respondents denied the request on the grounds that it was an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy” and did “not reasonably describe the documents.” The respondents also denied an administrative appeal, asserting that compliance with the request would be an unwarranted invasion of the applicants' privacy, citing, inter alia, Chapter 82-11 of the Code of the Town of Brookhaven.
The respondents' denial of the FOIL request was not arbitrary and capricious (see CPLR 7803[3]; Matter of Federation of N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Clubs v. New York City Police Dept., 73 N.Y.2d 92, 538 N.Y.S.2d 226, 535 N.E.2d 279; Property Tax Reduction Consultants v. Township of Islip, 21 A.D.3d 376, 377, 799 N.Y.S.2d 576).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 24, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)