Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ok Sun CHONG, appellant, v. Gunther SCHEELJE, respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Marguerite A. Grays, J.), dated March 24, 2021. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff pedestrian allegedly was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant at or near the intersection of Roosevelt Avenue and Parsons Boulevard in Queens County. Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant. The defendant filed an answer. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the plaintiff's violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152(a) was the sole proximate cause of the accident. The Supreme Court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appeals.
The defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff's violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152(a) was the sole proximate cause of the accident, and that he was free from fault in the happening of the injury-producing event (see Pixtun–Suret v. Gevinski, 165 AD3d 715, 716; Balliet v North Amityville Fire Dept., 133 AD3d 559, 560; Jahangir v. Logan Bus Co., Inc., 89 AD3d 1064). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence in admissible form to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the motion was not premature. The mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is insufficient to deny the motion (see Haidhaqi v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 153 AD3d 1328, 1329; Singh v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., Inc., 119 AD3d 768, 770).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
DILLON, J.P., MALTESE, GENOVESI and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2021–02893
Decided: July 19, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)