Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mary Ann McGRATH and Timothy B. Carleton, Appellants.
Appeal from two judgments of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered November 21, 1997, convicting defendants upon their pleas of guilty of the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.
Defendants were principals of Recovery Counseling Associates Inc., a corporation which provided outpatient alcohol rehabilitation services to various clients including some recipients of Medicaid. Following an investigation which revealed that fraudulent claims had been filed by the corporation for Medicaid reimbursement, defendants pleaded guilty to the crime of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree as charged in a superior court information. On November 21, 1997, County Court sentenced defendants to 1 to 3 years in prison. In addition, defendants were ordered, along with other codefendants, to pay restitution in the amount of $76,608. On appeal, defendants argue that the sentences imposed by County Court are harsh and excessive.1
We affirm. We acknowledge that there are considerations which support more lenient sentences herein, such as the valuable services provided by defendants to the community as evidenced by the numerous letters written on their behalf, defendants' expressions of remorse for their actions and the recommendations contained in the presentence reports. Nevertheless, inasmuch as County Court considered appropriate factors in imposing sentence, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion nor do we find that extraordinary circumstances exist warranting a reduction (see generally, People v. Hearn, 248 A.D.2d 889, 669 N.Y.S.2d 984; see, People v. Torres, 237 A.D.2d 650, 652, 654 N.Y.S.2d 468; People v. Scotti, 232 A.D.2d 775, 777, 649 N.Y.S.2d 55, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 946, 655 N.Y.S.2d 897, 678 N.E.2d 510). Therefore, the judgments of conviction will not be disturbed.
ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed, and matters remitted to the County Court of Columbia County for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).
FOOTNOTES
1. Defendants are out on bail pending appeal.
CARDONA, P.J.
MERCURE, WHITE, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 03, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)