Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Terron EVANS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of possessing weapons, disobeying a direct order and failing to comply with search and frisk procedures in violation of prison disciplinary rules. The charges stemmed from the discovery of a metal object in petitioner's mouth during a frisk with a hand-held scanner. When told to spit the object out, petitioner ran and was seen throwing an object on the roof of a recreation shack, which was later retrieved and found to be a razor. He was sentenced to, inter alia, nine months in the special housing unit. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the detailed misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer who witnessed the event, together with the testimony presented at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Hay v. Goord, 239 A.D.2d 692, 657 N.Y.S.2d 1019). The conflicting testimony presented by petitioner merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Alvarado v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 650, 651, 675 N.Y.S.2d 220, 221). The remaining arguments advanced by petitioner, including his claims of Hearing Officer bias and that the penalty imposed was excessive, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 03, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)