Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: SARAFINA AISHA F. (Anonymous). Commissioner of Social Services, et al., Respondent; Felix F. (Anonymous), Appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Service Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkin, J.), dated October 31, 1997, which, after a fact-finding hearing and a waiver of a dispositional hearing, inter alia, terminated his parental rights with respect to his child, Sarafina Aisha F., and transferred custody and guardianship rights of the child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and St. Christopher-Ottilie for purposes of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
St. Christopher-Ottilie (hereinafter the agency) met its burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts by various means to strengthen the parental relationship (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][a], [f] ).
The record demonstrates that the agency met its burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that the father permanently neglected the child by failing to plan for her future. Despite the agency's efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790). In addition to his unsatisfactory record of parental visits, he stated that it was not his responsibility to plan for the child, failed to provide a certificate of completion of parenting skills classes, and failed to remain drug-free.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 30, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)