Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
April Rose GERHARDT, etc., et al., appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, et al., respondents, et al., defendant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated September 27, 2002, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404, inter alia, to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants New York Transit Authority and John J. Lebrio as against the weight of the evidence.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the Supreme Court (see CPLR 5525[a]; 5526; Matter of Board of Educ. of Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School Dist. v. Polonio, 308 A.D.2d 491, 764 N.Y.S.2d 646; Garnerville Holding Co. v. IMC Mgt., 299 A.D.2d 450, 749 N.Y.S.2d 892; Whyte v. Destra, 298 A.D.2d 384, 751 N.Y.S.2d 391; Sultan v. Sultan, 295 A.D.2d 498, 744 N.Y.S.2d 852). Here, although the plaintiffs seek review of an order which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404, inter alia, to set aside a jury verdict in favor of two of the defendants, they did not include the trial transcript in the record. Accordingly, the record is inadequate to enable this court to render an informed decision on the merits, and the appeal must be dismissed (see Eastern Numismatics v. Binnick, 300 A.D.2d 620, 753 N.Y.S.2d 517; Garnerville Holding Co. v. IMC Mgt., supra; Whyte v. Destra, supra; Matison v. County of Nassau, 290 A.D.2d 494, 736 N.Y.S.2d 115; Matter of Nicoll, 191 A.D.2d 444, 594 N.Y.S.2d 296).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 14, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)