Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Bruce R. MILLER et al., Petitioners, v. Mary Ann BALLAND et al., Respondents.
Proceeding initiated in this Court pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 to remove respondents from various offices in the Town of Big Flats, Chemung County.
Petitioners, both residents of the Town of Big Flats, Chemung County, commenced this proceeding seeking to remove respondent Mary Ann Balland from the office of Town Supervisor and respondents Duane Gardner, Leonard Kaner and Edward Fairbrother as Members of the Town Council. The petition asserts that respondents unlawfully issued a building permit for a new Town community center by not collecting a fee and failing to obtain a sewage treatment system construction permit until after construction began (see Town of Big Flats Mun. Code §§ 15.04.040, 15.04.170). Respondents do not dispute the basic facts underlying the petition and move to dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim. We grant respondents' motion.
To state a cause of action under Public Officers Law § 36, a petition must allege that the respondents' conduct was plagued by “ ‘self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trust’ ” (Matter of Morin v. Gallagher, 221 A.D.2d 765, 766, 633 N.Y.S.2d 632 [1995], quoting Matter of Deats v. Carpenter, 61 A.D.2d 320, 322, 403 N.Y.S.2d 128 [1978]; accord Matter of Miller v. Filion, 304 A.D.2d 1016, 1017, 756 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2003] ). Here, even assuming that respondents did not strictly follow the procedure for issuing a building permit, minor administrative oversights and deviations from the law are not enough to precipitate the drastic remedy of removal (see Matter of Morin v. Gallagher, supra at 766, 633 N.Y.S.2d 632; Matter of Deats v. Carpenter, supra at 322, 403 N.Y.S.2d 128). Accordingly, we conclude that the petition fails to state a cause of action and must be dismissed. An award of sanctions against petitioners, as requested by respondents, is not warranted under the circumstances (see Matter of Morin v. Gallagher, supra at 766, 633 N.Y.S.2d 632).
ADJUDGED that the motion to dismiss is granted, with costs, and petition dismissed.
KANE, J.
MERCURE, J.P., PETERS, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 13, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)