Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Tyheem Yefya KEESH, Petitioner, v. Joseph T. SMITH, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with violating various prison disciplinary rules. At the conclusion of respective tier II disciplinary hearings, petitioner was found guilty on March 24, 2008 of smuggling and stealing state property and on April 2, 2008 of possessing contraband. Those determinations were affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony introduced at the first hearing (see Matter of Rivera v. Fischer, 57 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 867 N.Y.S.2d 711 [2008] ), like the misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony introduced at the second hearing (see Matter of Peana v. Fischer, 54 A.D.3d 1126, 1126-1127, 864 N.Y.S.2d 577 [2008] ), provided substantial independent evidence to support the respective determinations of guilt at each hearing. We have reviewed petitioner's procedural contentions, including his claims that both of the Hearing Officers were biased and that he was denied documentary evidence and the right to present witness testimony at the hearings, and find they lack merit.
ADJUDGED that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 16, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)