Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Russell FRANCIS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered September 14, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction of murder in the second degree to manslaughter in the second degree, and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for sentencing on the conviction of manslaughter in the second degree.
The defendant killed the decedent, allegedly during a struggle for a gun. The defendant was charged with, inter alia, two counts of murder in the second degree (intentional murder and depraved indifference murder). The defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree under Penal Law § 125.25(2) (depraved indifference murder) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly refused to charge the jury on the defense of justification (see People v. Reynoso, 73 N.Y.2d 816, 818, 537 N.Y.S.2d 113, 534 N.E.2d 30; People v. Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299, 301, 456 N.Y.S.2d 677, 442 N.E.2d 1188; People v. Varughese, 21 A.D.3d 1126, 1127-1128, 801 N.Y.S.2d 415; People v. Plowden, 5 A.D.3d 609, 609-610, 772 N.Y.S.2d 855; People v. Battee, 308 A.D.2d 596, 765 N.Y.S.2d 515; People v. Brathwaite, 276 A.D.2d 707, 714 N.Y.S.2d 754).
Nevertheless, we find that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction of murder in the second degree. The evidence failed to demonstrate the degree of depravity and indifference to human life required for depraved indifference murder (see People v. Feingold, 7 N.Y.3d 288, 293-294, 819 N.Y.S.2d 691, 852 N.E.2d 1163; People v. Suarez, 6 N.Y.3d 202, 208-215, 811 N.Y.S.2d 267, 844 N.E.2d 721; People v. Payne, 3 N.Y.3d 266, 270-272, 786 N.Y.S.2d 116, 819 N.E.2d 634; People v. McMillon, 31 A.D.3d 136, 816 N.Y.S.2d 167). The evidence was legally sufficient, however, to establish the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15[1]; see People v. Atkinson, 7 N.Y.3d 765, 766-767, 819 N.Y.S.2d 858, 853 N.E.2d 227; People v. McMillon, supra).
Accordingly, we modify the judgment by reducing the conviction of murder in the second degree to manslaughter in the second degree and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for sentencing on the conviction of manslaughter in the second degree.
The defendant's remaining contentions raised in his supplemental brief have been rendered academic in light of the above determination.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 24, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)