Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jorge L. LINARES, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of unauthorized exchange. We now confirm.
Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report and hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it (see Matter of Vigliotti v. Bell, 52 A.D.3d 1064, 1064, 860 N.Y.S.2d 288 [2008] ). To the extent that petitioner argues that the misbehavior report was defective because it incorrectly listed his cube as the location where the documents in question were discovered, there has been no demonstration that this apparently inadvertent error prejudiced petitioner, and the report, overall, was sufficient to apprise petitioner of the charge against him and enable him to prepare a defense (see Matter of Di Rose v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 270 A.D.2d 675, 675, 704 N.Y.S.2d 721 [2000] ). As for petitioner's claim that the Hearing Officer was biased, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination in issue flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Sweat v. Fischer, 52 A.D.3d 1142, 1143, 862 N.Y.S.2d 137 [2008] ).
Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and are unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 05, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)