Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis GIPSON, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered June 27, 1997, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced to a five-year term of probation. Defendant thereafter was found to have violated the terms of his probation by failing to submit to a required “drug and alcohol evaluation” and, as a result, his probation was revoked and he was sentenced to a prison term of 21/313 to 7 years.
Defendant now appeals, contending that the People failed to meet their burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that he violated the terms of his probation (see, CPL 410.70[3] ). We disagree. Defendant admitted that he failed to report for the substance abuse evaluation, offering the excuse that he was unable to attend because he could not afford the $30 fee. In our view, the testimony of defendant's probation officer that defendant repeatedly failed to submit to such evaluation, together with defendant's own admission of guilt, provides ample support for County Court's finding that defendant violated the terms of his probation. Defendant's representations that he found it impossible to afford the evaluation fee of $30 between the time of his release on probation in December 1995 and the time of his arraignment in May 1997, even after he had found employment, are too frivolous to merit discussion.
We are equally unpersuaded by defendant's assertion that his sentence was harsh and excessive. Under the circumstances presented here, we find the sentence appropriate and we decline to disturb it.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
CREW, III, J.
CARDONA, P.J., and MIKOLL, WHITE and YESAWICH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)