Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dayquan JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in a sexual act and committing an unhygienic act. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony comprise substantial evidence in support of respondent's determination (see Matter of Abdul-Khaliq v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 872, 872, 822 N.Y.S.2d 742 [2006]; Matter of Powell v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 876, 877, 823 N.Y.S.2d 579 [2006] ). The fact that petitioner's conduct was unwitnessed does not require annulment of the determination, as circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom formed a sufficient basis for the finding of guilt (see Matter of Gourdine v. Goord, 18 A.D.3d 1045, 1045-1046, 795 N.Y.S.2d 772 [2005]; Matter of Carter v. Goord, 8 A.D.3d 771, 772, 778 N.Y.S.2d 234 [2004] ). Moreover, contrary to petitioner's contentions, the substance found on the floor was properly identified through common observation (see Matter of Williams v. Ricks, 285 A.D.2d 779, 779, 732 N.Y.S.2d 111 [2001] ), and there was no requirement that it be subjected to DNA testing (see Matter of Jackson v. Smith, 6 A.D.3d 1016, 1017, 775 N.Y.S.2d 611 [2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 667, 784 N.Y.S.2d 4, 817 N.E.2d 821 [2004] ).
To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining claims have been considered and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
LAHTINEN, J.
MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, PETERS and ROSE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 24, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)