Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony BOTTOM, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Donohue, J.), entered July 31, 2007 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition, and (2) from an order of said court, entered March 4, 2008 in Albany County, which denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration.
Petitioner is serving a prison sentence of 25 years to life for his conviction of two counts of murder in the second degree. In 2006, he made his third appearance before respondent and his request for release was denied. After exhausting his administrative remedies, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging that determination. Supreme Court, finding that petitioner's extradition to California during the pendency of the appeal rendered the matter moot, dismissed the petition. Petitioner's subsequent motion to reargue was denied.
Upon review of petitioner's arguments, we conclude that the petition was properly dismissed. Petitioner has been extradited to California and is no longer “in the custody of a correctional facility as an inmate in connection with which [respondent] has parole jurisdiction” (Matter of Beattie v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 39 N.Y.2d 445, 447, 384 N.Y.S.2d 397, 348 N.E.2d 873 [1976]; see People ex rel. Matthews v. New York State Div. of Parole, 95 N.Y.2d 640, 644 n. 1, 722 N.Y.S.2d 213, 744 N.E.2d 1149 [2001]; People ex rel. De Gina v. McMahon, 29 N.Y.2d 550, 324 N.Y.S.2d 97, 272 N.E.2d 585 [1971]; People ex rel. Bilboa v. Romano, 106 A.D.2d 595, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1011 [1984] ).
Finally, no appeal lies as of right from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Matter of Morales v. Travis, 32 A.D.3d 1094, 820 N.Y.S.2d 820 [2006], lv. denied 7 N.Y.3d 917, 827 N.Y.S.2d 684, 860 N.E.2d 986 [2006] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs.
CARDONA, P.J.
PETERS, ROSE, KAVANAGH and STEIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 30, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)