Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GIHON, LLC, Respondent, v. 501 SECOND STREET, LLC, Appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated April 9, 2002, as granted the plaintiff's motion to enjoin it from taking action to terminate the lease.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A tenant seeking Yellowstone relief must demonstrate that (1) it holds a commercial lease, (2) it has received a notice of default, notice to cure, or threat of termination of the lease, (3) its application for a temporary restraining order was made prior to expiration of the cure period and termination of the lease, and (4) it has the desire and ability to cure the alleged default by any means short of vacating the premises (see First Nat. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 N.Y.2d 630, 290 N.Y.S.2d 721, 237 N.E.2d 868; King Party Ctr. of Pitkin Ave. v. Minco Realty, 286 A.D.2d 373, 729 N.Y.S.2d 183; Mayfair Super Mkts. v. Serota, 262 A.D.2d 461, 692 N.Y.S.2d 415). The purpose of a Yellowstone injunction is to allow a tenant confronted by a threat of termination of the lease to obtain a stay tolling the running of the cure period so that after a determination of the merits, the tenant may cure the defect and avoid a forfeiture of the leasehold (see Graubard Mollen Horowitz Pomeranz & Shapiro v. 600 Third Ave. Assocs., 93 N.Y.2d 508, 693 N.Y.S.2d 91, 715 N.E.2d 117; King Party Ctr. of Pitkin Ave. v. Minco Realty, supra; Long Is. Gynecological Servs. v. 1103 Stewart Ave. Assocs. Ltd. Partnership, 224 A.D.2d 591, 638 N.Y.S.2d 959).
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff Yellowstone relief. The plaintiff presented evidence that it possessed a commercial leasehold interest, that it had received two notices of default threatening termination, that the time for cure of any default had not expired, and that it had the ability to cure any default.
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 16, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)