Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Reynaldo AGOSTO, petitioner, v. Glenn GOORD, etc., respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated May 23, 1997, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, as modified by a decision of the Director of the Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, dated August 5, 1997, finding that the petitioner had violated 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(5)(iii), and imposing penalties.
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, the determination, as modified, is annulled, without costs or disbursements, and the respondent is directed to expunge from the petitioner's institutional record all references to the charges underlying the determination.
The Commissioner's determination that the petitioner violated a prison disciplinary rule by instigating a work stoppage is not supported by substantial evidence. As in Matter of Milland v. Goord, 264 A.D.2d 846, 698 N.Y.S.2d 245 [decided herewith], the in camera testimony of the correction officer who interviewed the confidential informants was not sufficiently detailed and specific to enable the Hearing Officer to independently assess the credibility and the reliability of the informants (see also, Matter of Cotto v. Bautista, 252 A.D.2d 977, 676 N.Y.S.2d 373; Matter of Martinez v. Goord, 248 A.D.2d 1001, 670 N.Y.S.2d 148; Matter of Holmes v. Senkowski, 238 A.D.2d 629, 655 N.Y.S.2d 695; cf., Matter of Valentin v. Goord, 259 A.D.2d 911, 687 N.Y.S.2d 208; Matter of Medina v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 973, 678 N.Y.S.2d 919). Accordingly, the determination must be annulled.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 27, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)