Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Angela Y. ABBOTT, respondent, v. Donte R. BURNES, appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (MacKenzie, J.), dated February 22, 2005, which, after a hearing, was granted in favor of the mother.
ORDERED that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the record (see Matter of Phillips v. Laland, 4 A.D.3d 529, 771 N.Y.S.2d 718; Matter of Bryan S., 286 A.D.2d 685, 729 N.Y.S.2d 911; Matter of Topper v. Topper, 271 A.D.2d 613, 706 N.Y.S.2d 147). The record supports the Family Court's determination that, based on a preponderance of the evidence, the father committed an act which constituted the family offense of assault on December 4, 2004, warranting the issuance of an order of protection (see Family Ct. Act §§ 812, 832; Penal Law § 120.00[2] ).
The father's contention that the Family Court failed to adequately specify the particular offense under Family Court Act § 812 that he had committed is without merit. It was not incumbent upon the Family Court to specify the particular family offense where it was clear from the petition and the father's own closing statement that he was charged with conduct constituting assault (see Matter of Topper v. Topper, supra).
Similarly, there is no merit to the father's contention that the Family Court failed to adequately state the facts it deemed essential to its determination since “the record is sufficient for this [c]ourt to exercise its factual review power” (Matter of Leon G., 7 A.D.3d 524, 525, 776 N.Y.S.2d 77; see also Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Steven K., 176 A.D.2d 326, 329, 574 N.Y.S.2d 767).
Furthermore, since there was a sound basis in the record to support the Family Court's determination, the father's contention that the Family Court unduly relied on the Law Guardian's recommendation is unavailing.
In light of our determination, we need not decide the remaining issue.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 14, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)