Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Patricia AGUIRRE, a/k/a Tania Cabrera, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered April 8, 2004, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing that properly includes a period of postrelease supervision as part of the sentence.
The defendant was sentenced, as promised, to a determinate term of 10 years imprisonment. The sentencing minutes indicate that the Supreme Court also stated that the defendant would be subject to a period of postrelease supervision by the Parole Board, but did not pronounce the period thereof. However, a notation on the order of sentence and commitment signed by the Clerk of that court indicated that the defendant's period of postrelease supervision was to be five years.
Since the defendant does not wish to take back her plea of guilty, and the term of the period of postrelease supervision was not pronounced by the sentencing court, this Court must vacate the sentence and remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing that properly includes a period of postrelease supervision as part of the sentence (see People v. Sparber, 10 N.Y.3d 457, 469, 859 N.Y.S.2d 582, 889 N.E.2d 459; see also People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 360 N.Y.S.2d 623, 318 N.E.2d 784, cert. denied 419 U.S. 1122, 95 S.Ct. 806, 42 L.Ed.2d 822; cf. People v. Hill, 9 N.Y.3d 189, 849 N.Y.S.2d 13, 879 N.E.2d 152; People v. Van Deusen, 7 N.Y.3d 744, 819 N.Y.S.2d 854, 853 N.E.2d 223).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 21, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)