IN RE: Jean LAVELLE (2003)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Jean LAVELLE, Appellant, v. Thomas P. RIBAUDO, etc., Respondent.

Decided: November 10, 2003

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SONDRA MILLER and HOWARD MILLER, JJ.

Jean Lavelle, Whitestone, NY, appellant pro se. Thomas P. Ribaudo, Setauket, NY, respondent pro se.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered January 8, 2003, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Plosky, H.E.), entered September 5, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied her petition to direct the father to reinstate health insurance coverage for the children with the Oxford Health Plan.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother's objections to the order entered September 5, 2002, since the father complied with the provisions of the parties' separation agreement requiring him to provide health insurance for the children.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network