Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gerard OSBORNE, Petitioner, v. John McGINNIS, as Superintendent of Downstate Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from refusing to obey a direct order and intentionally exposing one's private body parts. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging that part of the determination that found him guilty of intentionally exposing his private body parts on the ground that it was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. The misbehavior report, written by the correction officer who observed petitioner in a public area “rubbing and pulling on his penis” and taking his penis into his hand to masturbate, was “ ‘sufficiently relevant and probative’ ” to support the finding of guilt (Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477, quoting Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 616-617, 499 N.Y.S.2d 659, 490 N.E.2d 526; see, Matter of Aguilera v. Stinson, 233 A.D.2d 628, 649 N.Y.S.2d 849). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are properly before this court, have been examined and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 16, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)