Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: LAWRENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, appellant, v. LAWRENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award which, inter alia, directed the respondent, Lawrence Public Schools, to cease and desist from violating a provision of a stipulation between the parties dated May 23, 2002, which required the respondent to designate members of the petitioner's bargaining unit to perform special education services outside of the geographical boundaries of the school district, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), entered April 3, 2006, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The enforcement of the provision of the stipulation of settlement dated May 23, 2002, between the petitioner and the respondent, Lawrence Public Schools, requiring the respondent to designate members of the petitioner's bargaining unit for special education services delivered outside the geographical boundaries of the respondent was contrary to Education Law former § 3602-c(2) (L. 1990, ch. 53, § 49) in effect at the time of the alleged violations of the stipulation. That statutory provision required the respondent to “contract with the school district in which the nonpublic school attended by the pupil is located, for the provision of services pursuant to this section.” Since the arbitration award was contrary to well-defined statutory law, it violated public policy and therefore was unenforceable (see Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 N.Y.3d 72, 80, 769 N.Y.S.2d 451, 801 N.E.2d 827; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v. Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 99 N.Y.2d 1, 6-7, 750 N.Y.S.2d 805, 780 N.E.2d 490). Submitting the dispute to arbitration did not authorize the arbitrator to fashion an award which violated public policy (see Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v. Port Washington Teachers Assn., 45 N.Y.2d 411, 418, 408 N.Y.S.2d 453, 380 N.E.2d 280; Matter of Union Free Dist. # 15, Town of Hempstead v. Lawrence Teachers Assn., 33 A.D.3d 808, 822 N.Y.S.2d 767).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)