Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamal TAYLOR, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ayres, J.), rendered February 21, 2007, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Dixon, 29 N.Y.2d 55, 57, 323 N.Y.S.2d 825, 272 N.E.2d 329). Contrary to the defendant's contention, his plea was not rendered involuntary by the court's failure to advise him that as a consequence of this plea he may receive an enhanced sentence for any crime that he may commit in the future (see People v. McGrath, 43 N.Y.2d 803, 804, 402 N.Y.S.2d 390, 373 N.E.2d 284; People v. Sanchez-Martinez, 35 A.D.3d 632, 633, 829 N.Y.S.2d 121; People v. Outer, 197 A.D.2d 543, 544, 602 N.Y.S.2d 215; People v. Depeyster, 115 A.D.2d 613, 496 N.Y.S.2d 275). Furthermore, his comments at sentencing did not call into question the voluntariness of his plea, and thus, the court was not required to inquire, sua sponte, into the validity of his plea, or to offer him an opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing sentence (see People v. Conti, 285 A.D.2d 557, 727 N.Y.S.2d 884; People v. Fontana, 267 A.D.2d 398, 700 N.Y.S.2d 732).
The defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel simply because his attorney failed to make a motion to withdraw his plea, which was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v. Ford, 44 A.D.3d 1070, 844 N.Y.S.2d 400; People v. Caple, 279 A.D.2d 635, 720 N.Y.S.2d 166). Such a motion would have had “little or no chance of success” (People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 287, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883; see People v. Caban, 5 N.Y.3d 143, 152, 800 N.Y.S.2d 70, 833 N.E.2d 213; People v. Brown, 13 A.D.3d 548, 549, 786 N.Y.S.2d 583; People v. Abney, 10 A.D.3d 617, 781 N.Y.S.2d 456; People v. Sosa, 258 A.D.2d 312, 313, 685 N.Y.S.2d 658).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 03, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)