Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Deborah G. GUERIN, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 6, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she failed to comply with reporting and registration requirements.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits from May 6, 1996 through August 18, 1996 because she failed to comply with the reporting and registration requirements of the local unemployment office. Despite having read the back of the initial decision finding claimant ineligible to receive benefits, which directed that she continue to certify for benefits if she remained unemployed, claimant stopped certifying for benefits based on her belief that she lacked the necessary evidence to support her position. Although claimant alleged at the hearing that she was advised by a local representative of the local unemployment office that she no longer needed to register for benefits, the local representative testified to the contrary, thereby creating a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Burger [Commissioner of Labor], 253 A.D.2d 953, 677 N.Y.S.2d 825). Under the circumstances presented here, we find no reason to disturb the finding that claimant failed to demonstrate good cause for not complying with the reporting and registration requirements (see, e.g., Matter of Stabile [Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 906, 672 N.Y.S.2d 517; Matter of Falco [Sweeney], 226 A.D.2d 878, 640 N.Y.S.2d 655).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)