Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jeffrey ROSENBLATT, Appellant, v. Andrew M. KAHN, Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated October 22, 1996, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and dismissed his cross motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff, an experienced softball player, was injured when, while playing first base in a league softball game, the defendant slid into him after hitting a ground ball to the shortstop. In his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant argued that sliding into first base was a foreseeable event during a softball game and that the plaintiff had assumed the risk of the injury at issue. The plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment arguing that the nature of the slide rendered it unforeseeable, and the risk of injury therefrom was not assumed. We now affirm the dismissal of the complaint.
The plaintiff, as a voluntary participant in the softball game at issue, assumed the risk that he might be injured by a sliding opposing player (see, Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 662 N.Y.S.2d 421, 685 N.E.2d 202; Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432, 510 N.Y.S.2d 49, 502 N.E.2d 964; Maddox v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 270, 496 N.Y.S.2d 726, 487 N.E.2d 553; Totino v. Nassau County Council of Boy Scouts of Am., 213 A.D.2d 710, 625 N.Y.S.2d 51; Hoffman v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 716, 569 N.Y.S.2d 99; Robinson v. Town of Babylon, 166 A.D.2d 434, 560 N.Y.S.2d 507). Further, upon review of the record, including a videotape of the play in question, we find that the plaintiff has failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the nature of the slide otherwise rendered it actionable (see, Turcotte v. Fell, supra, 68 N.Y.2d at 441, 510 N.Y.S.2d 49, 502 N.E.2d 964 [“flagrant infractions unrelated to the normal method of playing the game and done without any competitive purpose” may be actionable]; see, e.g., Nabozny v. Barnhill, 31 Ill.App.3d 212, 334 N.E.2d 258; Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, 601 F.2d 516, cert. denied 444 U.S. 931, 100 S.Ct. 275, 62 L.Ed.2d 188). Indeed, sliding into first base is expressly permitted by the rules of play.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)