Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Gregory A. DERIAN, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 13, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a store manager until he was discharged from his employment for violating a company policy requiring that the store's safe be kept securely locked at all times. Claimant's failure to abide by this rule resulted in the theft of $1,467 from the store's safe. Following his discharge, claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits, stating on his application that he had lost his employment due to corporate downsizing. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled, inter alia, that claimant had lost his employment due to misconduct and that he had made willful false statements to obtain benefits.
We affirm. Failure to comply with the employer's established policies and procedures constitutes disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Rooney [Sweeney], 236 A.D.2d 775, 654 N.Y.S.2d 51, 52; Matter of Kobrin [Sweeney], 216 A.D.2d 625, 626, 627 N.Y.S.2d 179). Substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant lost his employment due to such disqualifying misconduct and that he made willful false statements to obtain them. To the extent that claimant provided testimony to the contrary, this merely presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)