Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Michael P. TOMMASI, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 26, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.
Claimant was employed in the sheet metal industry until he was laid off for lack of work. The record discloses that while he was collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant formed his own corporation, M & A Metals Inc., of which claimant was president, a 49% shareholder and the principal employee. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was ineligible for benefits because he was not totally unemployed and found him guilty of making willful misrepresentations regarding his employment status. Substantial evidence supports the Board's ruling. This court has held that a claimant who is a principal in an active corporation is not totally unemployed, even if the corporation is unprofitable (see, Matter of Leban [Sweeney], 233 A.D.2d 738, 650 N.Y.S.2d 53, lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 811, 657 N.Y.S.2d 403, 679 N.E.2d 642; Matter of Egbuna [Hudacs], 198 A.D.2d 577, 578, 603 N.Y.S.2d 229). Furthermore, claimant failed to report his activities on behalf of the corporation either when he applied for benefits or during the six months that he received them. As such, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant made willful misrepresentations (see, Matter of Rotter [Sweeney], 232 A.D.2d 800, 648 N.Y.S.2d 748). The Board's decision is, accordingly, affirmed.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 20, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)